WELCOME TO THE NORDIC MILSIM STORYLINE AND LORE!
Every event in our milsim series contributes to the ongoing development of a living storyline. The outcome of each battle shapes the future of the narrative, pushing it forward in unexpected directions.
While events are not always direct sequels to one another, they may unfold simultaneously in different parts of the fictional world—on separate battlefields with their own unique challenges. Still, every engagement is interconnected, and the decisions you make as a participant directly influence the course of the story.
In each section, you’ll find a map highlighting the location of the battle within our fictional world. Look for the green marker to see where the action is set—or where it has already taken place.
BACKGROUND
In 2014, with Russia on the verge of expanding its influence into Ukraine, NATO decided to conduct a preemptive strike into the Crimea region against Russian Forces . NATO’s new foothold in Ukraine would serve as a staging area for a larger incursion into Russia, in order to pacify the Russian regime before Russia could follow through on threats against NATO. This initial battle between Russian and NATO forces in Crimea represents a major point of contention, as NATO and Russia both state that the first move was made by the opposite side. This initial battle would be the first of many in a war between NATO and Russia that is still ongoing.
During the first 10 years of conflict, NATO increased their member states and subsequent manpower by granting membership to Montenegro, North Macedonia, Finland, and Sweden. With Sweden and Finland in the fight, Russia’s Baltic Sea access became contested. In order to regain access to the Baltic Sea shipping and supply lanes, Russian Forces invaded Sweden. Aside from Sweden’s ability to block Russia from access to the Baltic Sea, Sweden also contains resources that Russia is in desperate need of after a decade of sustained conflict. The opening of a new front in Sweden has also forced NATO to redirect forces to Scandinavia in an effort to push the Russians back to St Petersburg.
OPERATION FENRIR
Sweden is under siege. Russian forces, relentless and well-equipped, have launched a full-scale invasion, gradually pushing back the Swedish defenses. The initial onslaught was swift and brutal, catching the nation off guard. The skies filled with the roar of Russian jets and the rumble of armored columns advancing through the countryside.
NATO, while sympathetic, is stretched thin. Fierce battles rage across Poland and Germany, drawing most of their resources and attention. However, a flicker of hope remains. The United States has dispatched a contingent of special forces to assist in the beleaguered defense of Sweden. These elite units, trained for the most demanding of missions, have been integrated into the Swedish defensive efforts.
The situation has grown dire. Russian spetsnaz and paratroopers have made significant headway, driving south towards Stockholm from the north. Their objective is clear: the heart of Sweden. In their path lies the small town of Rosersberg, a strategic location that has now become the linchpin in the defense of the capital.
A small NATO force, a mix of American special forces and Swedish troops, has taken up positions in Rosersberg. Their orders are unequivocal: "Hold the town at all costs." The defenders are well aware that it is only a matter of time before the full force of the Russian advance reaches them. The air is thick with tension as they fortify their positions, laying mines, setting up machine gun nests, and preparing for the inevitable clash.
Every soldier knows the importance of their mission. If Rosersberg falls, the road to Stockholm lies open. Communication lines buzz with activity as final preparations are made. Ammunition is distributed, and the troops share a final, solemn moment, understanding that many of them may not see another sunrise.
As the first echoes of the Russian advance resonate in the distance, the defenders brace themselves. The horizon darkens with the approach of enemy forces. In the midst of uncertainty and impending chaos, the order rings clear: "Hold out!"
The battle for Rosersberg is about to begin, a desperate struggle that will test the mettle of every soldier within the town's limits. The fate of Stockholm, and perhaps Sweden itself, hangs in the balance.
ASSAULT ON ARLANDA
With NATO’s failure in Rosersberg at OP Fenrir, Russian Forces have successfully established a supply depot. Since the establishment of the Rosersberg depot, Russian Forces have been able to ferry in more manpower to support operations in the region.
Due to Russian Forces in Sweden being solely composed of airborne elements and land locked within Sweden, the supply depot represents a lifeline for Russian armored vehicles and troops in the region.
Recognizing this, NATO has dispatched a task force from Arlanda in an attempt to cut off and seize the Russian depot. Russian Forces are continuing to stockpile airdropped and looted supplies in preparation for their Assault on Arlanda.
Despite fierce resistance, the Russian Forces were unable to hold the depot against NATO's relentless advance. By the end of the operation, the depot lay in NATO hands, severing Russia's supply chain and forcing their forces into a precarious retreat. This victory has significantly shifted the balance of power in the region, leaving the Russian Forces scrambling to consolidate their remaining assets and regroup. NATO’s success at Rosersberg has not only bolstered their foothold in Sweden but also disrupted Russian plans for an assault on Arlanda.
THE PECHENGA PUSH
While NATO forces prepare for a prolonged conflict on Swedish soil, military high command faces mounting pressure to shift the initiative and relieve the strain on defensive positions across Scandinavia. The idea of launching an offensive operation to draw Russian forces away from the Scandinavian front gains traction. Swedish and Finnish military strategists propose a bold plan: an incursion into Russian territory to force Moscow to divert its manpower and resources. Among various targets, the town of Pechenga in the Murmansk Oblast emerges as a critical objective. Its proximity to the Russo-Finnish border and strategic location near the Barents Sea make it an ideal foothold for NATO operations in northern Russia.
Pechenga's importance goes beyond its geography. The town’s location along vital logistical routes and its potential as a forward operating base make it a tempting prize. Controlling Pechenga disrupts Russian supply lines and challenges their dominance in the Arctic region, which has become a theater of increasing military and economic importance. Additionally, the operation's success showcases NATO's capability to project power into Russian territory, bolstering morale among its member states and reinforcing the unity of the alliance during a challenging phase of the conflict.
The Swedish and Finnish task force responsible for planning the operation works tirelessly to address the immense challenges. The harsh Arctic climate, difficult terrain, and logistical complexities demand meticulous preparation. A combined arms approach is devised, incorporating amphibious assaults, air superiority operations, and rapid infantry deployment. Meanwhile, NATO naval forces provide critical support, ensuring the safe passage of troops and equipment through contested waters.
The diplomatic landscape remains delicate. Though NATO commits to defending its member states, direct incursions into Russian territory risk escalating the conflict into a broader regional or even global confrontation. As such, the operation is framed as a necessary countermeasure to ongoing Russian aggression in Scandinavia. Political leaders emphasize the limited scope of the mission, aiming to reassure the international community that the objective is not conquest but strategic realignment.
As NATO forces mobilize for the assault, Russian authorities grow increasingly aware of the threat to Pechenga. Russian intelligence agencies detect the buildup of troops and equipment near the border, triggering a flurry of activity in Moscow. The Kremlin recognizes that losing Pechenga would deal a significant blow to their operations in the region and opts for preemptive action. Civilian evacuation orders are issued in Pechenga and its surrounding areas as military planners scramble to reinforce the town’s defenses.
Within days, Russian airborne units redeploy to the Murmansk Oblast, forming the backbone of the defense. These elite troops are supported by local garrison forces and reserve units mobilized from nearby regions. The rugged terrain surrounding Pechenga, with its dense forests, steep hills, and numerous rivers, is fortified to create natural choke points and ambush zones. Russian engineers work around the clock to lay mines, build barricades, and establish defensive positions designed to slow NATO's advance.
NATO’s coalition presses forward with determination. Amphibious landing craft carrying Swedish, Finnish, and other NATO troops approach the designated beachheads under the cover of naval and aerial firepower. The landing itself represents a high-risk gamble, relying on precision coordination between ground forces and supporting elements. Commanders in the field focus on ensuring that the initial waves of troops can establish a secure perimeter before Russian forces have time to regroup.
The complexity of the mission becomes evident as troops prepare to navigate not only combat scenarios but also the unforgiving Arctic conditions. Subzero temperatures, limited daylight, and frequent snowstorms threaten to hamper visibility and mobility, adding another layer of difficulty to an already challenging operation. Soldiers rely heavily on their training and specialized equipment to face the environment, while medical teams brace for weather-related injuries alongside potential combat casualties.
Meanwhile, NATO political leaders engage in a delicate balancing act, striving to maintain cohesion among member states while managing public opinion. Reports of civilian evacuations from Pechenga spark debate over the operation's humanitarian implications, with critics questioning the necessity of pushing the conflict into Russian territory. NATO spokespeople emphasize the strategic importance of the mission, framing it as a decisive step to secure peace in Scandinavia and beyond.
The unfolding events in Pechenga draw global attention, with analysts speculating about the broader implications of the operation. Observers note that the decision to target Pechenga highlights NATO’s strategic focus on the Arctic, a region whose geopolitical significance continues to grow due to climate change and untapped natural resources. Beyond its immediate military objectives, NATO’s incursion into Pechenga signals its resolve to defend its interests and counter Russian expansionism. The stakes are immense, and the outcomes remain uncertain, leaving the world to watch as both sides prepare for the challenges ahead.
With Russian forces reeling from their losses in Pechenga and the broader Murmansk region, NATO continues to consolidate its territorial gains. Efforts are underway to secure occupied Russian territory and to purge Stockholm of isolated Russian saboteurs, operatives who appear to have been severed from central command.
Refusing to wait for Russia’s next move, NATO shifts its focus southward to the Republic of Karelia. Rich in natural resources such as gold, silver, iron, platinum, and copper, Karelia is more than a prize. It is a strategic linchpin. Its extensive rail infrastructure connects Murmansk to Saint Petersburg, making it vital to Russian logistics and troop movement.
At the heart of Karelia lies the rural town of Segezha, a critical railroad junction and the next target in NATO’s campaign. But Segezha is more than just key terrain. It is also the stronghold of HVI Leve Cheburav, known by his alias “Macedon.” A former member of Russia’s Food Policy and Environmental Management Council, Macedon has repurposed his political clout to rally support from former and current Russian-aligned nations. His efforts have culminated in the formation of a sprawling private military conglomerate known as PMC Karpova, composed primarily of non-Russian fighters sympathetic to Russia’s cause.
Segezha now serves as both a logistical hub and a political flashpoint. Macedon’s influence has transformed the town into a bastion of irregular warfare, where ideology and mercenary ambition collide. Intelligence suggests that elements of PMC Karpova are already entrenched in the area, with Russian regular forces likely within striking distance, enabled by Macedon’s deep political connections.
While the exact disposition of Russian forces in Karelia remains unclear, recent troop movements near Saint Petersburg hint at a broader strategy. The Kirov Railway, which runs through Segezha, may be leveraged to launch interdiction operations against advancing NATO units. If NATO can seize Segezha, it will sever a vital artery in Russia’s northern logistics network and strike a blow against both conventional and unconventional threats.
The decision to strike Segezha has stirred unease across diplomatic circles. While NATO frames the operation as a strategic necessity, critics warn that targeting a town with deep political entanglements risks inflaming tensions with neutral states sympathetic to Russia. Macedon’s ties to foreign governments and his ability to mobilize transnational fighters through PMC Karpova have introduced a volatile new dimension to the conflict, one that blurs the line between state warfare and proxy insurgency.
Policymakers debate the long-term implications of escalating operations within Russian territory. Some argue that NATO must press its advantage to prevent a resurgence of Russian influence, while others caution that each new offensive risks drawing the alliance into a broader and more unpredictable confrontation.
As NATO forces finalize preparations for the operation in Segezha, military planners emphasize the need for speed, precision, and containment. The objective is clear: disrupt Russian logistics, neutralize PMC Karpova’s influence, and Russia access to Karelia’s critical infrastructure.
